ONE IDENTITY
Single AEVION account → 42 nodes
JWT issued once by Auth unlocks every product. No fragmentation, no Stripe-style integration tax for new modules.
Try every layer in 8 minutes
Everything press, partners, and LPs need to write about AEVION without asking us first.
Three architectural pillars
JWT issued once by Auth unlocks every product. No fragmentation, no Stripe-style integration tax for new modules.
QRight registers the work, QSign seals it with HMAC-SHA256, IP Bureau issues an Ed25519 certificate — cryptographic evidence of authorship and time — with Shamir Secret Sharing, Planet validates compliance — all in one click.
Bank tier, advance limits, voting weight, tournament eligibility — all derived from the same composite score across modules — an integration a single-vertical competitor would have to rebuild end-to-end.
Show, don't tell
Short loops you can drop into a deck or share by link. Live recordings drop with the next batch update; URLs below open the live products in the meantime.
Total addressable market
We do not pick one bucket — the same Trust Graph is sold three times to three different buyers. Cross-sell is a side-effect of the architecture, not a feature. These are top-down category TAM estimates for context, not a revenue forecast: AEVION is pre-revenue today, and the capturable SAM/SOM is a fraction, sized bottom-up in the data room.
Bottom-up, not top-down
AEVION is pre-revenue. Instead of a top-down forecast, here is a conservative bottom-up model for three flagship modules, built on real published prices and explicit, labelled assumptions. Every input is an assumption you can challenge — not a claim. Beachhead = first paying cohort; Regional = a 3–5-year KZ / CIS / MENA reach.
One seat, the whole ecosystem
One seat unlocks every module today + everything shipped next. A free tier sits underneath as the on-ramp.
Priced against the stack, not a single tool. Serious usage on any one tool already runs $100–200/mo (Claude Max $200, ChatGPT Pro $200, Gemini Ultra ~$250), and a working creator stacks several — Claude + Midjourney + ElevenLabs + Higgsfield easily clears $200–400/mo across four logins. On the 12-month term AEVION is one seat at $200/mo — level with a SINGLE premium subscription, for the whole platform. We deliberately do NOT claim to undercut every tool at every term: a one-month commitment costs $400, above any of them, and that is the price of not committing. Earlier versions of this paragraph argued first that the flagship must sit ABOVE a premium tool, then that it sits BELOW all of them; both died with a reprice, and a false argument in the pitch is worse than no argument.
The ladder is the live plan, not a proposal: ($0/$400/$350/$300/$250/$200) for Free plus the five terms in the backend registry, and since 2026-09-16 every one of the five has a real Lemon Squeezy variant — the old caveat that the top step had no working checkout is gone. What stays honest to say: most modules are early MVPs and the cross-module agent layer is still early, so "replaces your stack" is the promise the price rests on, which is why a free tier sits underneath to earn the upgrade before later terms are priced higher.
| Base scenario · 1.5M reach | Reached | Free users | Paid seats | ARR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Month 1 | 300K | 12K | ~50 | ≈$0.12M run-rate |
| Month 6 | 900K | 36K | ~350 | ≈$0.84M run-rate |
| Month 12 | 1.5M | 60K | ~780 | ≈$1.87M |
This is a scenario, not a forecast — it stands or falls on the distribution assumption, and no Anthropic deal is signed. Fewer paid seats than a cheaper tier would win, but a higher ARPU. Seat counts are unchanged across every reprice of this model; only the ARPU input moved, and on 2026-09-16 it moved to $2,400/yr with the term ladder. Each row is that ARPU times the paid count beside it: 50 × $2,400 ≈ $0.12M, 350 × $2,400 = $0.84M, 780 × $2,400 ≈ $1.87M. The rows were recomputed rather than carried over, because the published ones had been left at an ARPU no version of the price ever charged (they implied ≈$2,560 per seat while the stated ARPU was $1,490). The base case (≈$1.87M ARR by month 12) and the ≈$2.76M beachhead of the bottom-up model above are two independent methods landing within ~1.5× of each other — not identical, but the same order of magnitude, which is the honest signal for diligence.
AEVION already meters every request per user (tokensIn/out across all providers) and routes across a deep provider roster — including free (OpenRouter, Together, Groq, Cerebras) and local (Ollama, LM Studio, $0 marginal) models. A single-vendor AI product cannot arbitrage cost this way.
At efficient routing (~$0.5/1M blended) and ~15% allowance utilisation, gross margin is ~85–95% across paid terms. The monthly token allowance is the SAME on every term — 50M tokens/mo, with a premium-model sub-cap at 10% of it (5M) — because the term changes the price of the month, not the volume inside it. That is deliberate, and it cuts the honest way: the shortest term pays $400 for the same 50M that the longest term pays $200 for, so margin is THINNEST on the longest commitment. The tail risk is a power user maxing the cap on a frontier model — which is why margin depends on two levers, not luck.
Today the caps are metered but not fully enforced on paid tiers, and the Anthropic provider still defaults to an expensive model. Both are cheap fixes, but until they ship the ~85–95% margin is a target, not a measured number. Stated plainly so diligence doesn't have to discover it.
Compounding moats
Every registration, signature, vote, transfer and tournament adds an edge to the graph. After ~10K active users the graph is self-defensible — competitors can build a registry, but not a graph.
Creators register IP in QRight, fans pay through AEVION Bank, royalties auto-flow back. Each side pulls in the other; switching to a competitor breaks the royalty stream.
Bank ties balance, savings goals, recurring payments, achievements and tier perks to the same identity. Average user accumulates 6+ scheduled flows after 90 days — leaving means rebuilding all of them.
Every new module makes existing modules more valuable: a new game in CyberChess raises Bank engagement; a new Awards track raises QRight registrations; a new AI agent in QCoreAI makes Multichat stickier. Marginal cost of a new node is near zero — they all share Auth, Bureau, Bank and Trust Graph.
12 live MVPs profiled below · 21 roadmap nodes
Single AEVION account — JWT that unlocks all 42 modules.
SHA-256 timestamp + author binding + geolocation — instant proof of creation.
HMAC-SHA256 sign and verify — auto-invoked from QRight and Bureau.
Cryptographic proof-of-authorship bureau — signed, timestamped certificates in seconds.
Post-quantum Ed25519 + Shamir's Secret Sharing for threshold key recovery.
Wallet + auto-royalties + savings + Trust-Graph-gated credit, all in one app.
Lightweight non-custodial ledger — accounts, top-ups, P2P transfers, CSV audit.
Music & Film tracks on the Planet validator layer — recognition with AEC payout.
Stockfish-backed engine, 1000+ puzzles, AI coach — wins flow into your Trust Score.
One AI surface across Claude, GPT-4o, Gemini, DeepSeek, Grok — knows every AEVION module.
Parallel agent sessions over QCoreAI — code, finance, IP, content in one window.
Fully-alive AI video from a text brief — no actor, direct engine APIs, built-in provenance.
Cross-cutting evidence root — multi-validator certification for code, music, video, web.
One stack, four buyers
AEVION is one codebase that solves four distinct customer journeys. Each persona below pulls revenue from a different module mix — but every dollar settles into the same Trust Graph and the same wallet.
Maya releases an AI-assisted album. Each track is registered in QRight (proof of authorship + timestamp), gets a Bureau certificate she can attach to streaming-platform takedown notices, is submitted to Awards/Music for community voting, and royalties from any verification or stream auto-flow into her AEVION Bank wallet.
5-person studio delivers brand identities, code repos and product designs for 30+ clients/year. Every deliverable is registered in QRight with the client as co-author, signed via QSign, and the client receives a Bureau certificate with a public /verify URL embedded in the invoice. Disputes drop to zero.
AI-cinema startup pumps 50 short films per quarter. Each render is hashed in QRight, sealed by Quantum Shield, submitted to Awards/Film. Planet validators vote on originality and rights; winners get prize money in AEC directly to studio's Bank account, used to spin up the next render farm cycle.
ESG team at a regulated company uses Planet to certify which code modules and content have been validated. QSign audit log proves nothing was changed since approval. Bureau certificates are filed with the regulator. Multichat agents over QCoreAI answer compliance queries from internal teams.
Illustrative — not real quotes
The company is pre-revenue and the cards below are NOT attributed customer quotes. Each is an illustrative scenario showing how a target user in that segment would run the pipeline end-to-end. They will be replaced with real, attributed testimonials once early customers ship and consent.
I registered 14 tracks in QRight in one afternoon. The Bureau certificate came back with a verify URL I just paste into takedown notices. That alone saved me €2K in legal fees.
Every render gets hashed, sealed and entered into Awards/Film automatically. Voting drove our first paid commission — the buyer cited the Planet certificate as the deciding factor.
We were planning to spend 6 months on a custom audit-trail. Two weeks with QSign + Planet replaced the entire workstream. Internal review committee accepted the Bureau certificates as filing evidence.
The /verify/{id} URL embedded in our invoices ended client disputes overnight. We don't argue about who owns what anymore — the cert speaks for itself.
Illustrative composites of target use cases — not real customer quotes. Attributed testimonials will replace these once early customers consent.
20 more nodes on the roadmap
Hybrid model router — auto-select best provider per task.
Reduces vendor lock-in; smooths LLM market volatility.
Trade and transfer without constant connectivity.
TAM expansion to emerging markets and remote regions.
Embedded payments core for AEVION apps and partners.
Faster monetisation of every new vertical — no payment MVP needed each time.
Privacy-first card with masking and anti-fraud.
Premium B2C SKU; cross-sell with QPayNet and QTrade.
Privacy-preserving and energy-efficient crypto layer.
Foundation for tokenisation without privacy compromise — institutional positioning.
Personal AI health coach (not a doctor replacement).
Sticky daily-use; insurance/wellness partnerships within regulation.
Longevity and anti-aging biomarker plans.
Premium high-LTV segment; long retention horizons.
Psychological wellbeing with AI and offline mode.
Socially significant — ESG line for institutional investors.
Addiction recovery support with NGO and clinic partnerships.
Long-term retention programmes; trust through privacy and ethical design.
Digital avatar for work and communication.
New subscription class with premium customisation assets.
Multilingual safe AI content for children.
High willingness-to-pay parent segment; localisation as scaling lever.
International music content project — emotional brand engine.
Cross-media: music → apps → merch; cultural ESG narrative.
Idea, MVP or working product — each listed with its own deal terms and a free deterministic assessment.
Marketplace economics on top of the utility set — listing flow works end to end; take rate and investor subscriptions are the open question.
Anti-chaos: focus and task structure for knowledge workers.
Daily utility; productivity data feeds AI personalisation.
Map of real needs and events — signal aggregator.
B2G + media data asset (with ethics and consent).
Energy/emotion currency concept — research foundation for token mechanics.
Future token mechanics R&D; brand differentiator.
Smart documents with access control and lifespan.
Reduces legal risk in B2B pipelines; combines with QSign + Planet.
Alternative private network for regulatory-sensitive products.
R&D asset in privacy narrative; synergy with VeilNetX.
Digital vault for the next generation — inheritance and long-term storage.
High-WTP emotional use case; compliance + inheritance as recurring revenue line.
DAO and transparent community governance with on-chain reputation.
Value-distribution mechanism for ecosystem holders — primes future tokenisation.
Competitive landscape
AEVION competes with point-solutions in five adjacent markets. None offer the unified pipeline; more importantly, none can build the Trust Graph that compounds across them.
Sign-only. No registry, no compliance, no creator economy, no wallet. Customers still need 4 other vendors.
QSign is one of 42 modules — same payload format, same Trust Graph edge, same audit log. Bundled at zero marginal cost.
Cryptographic proof exists, but no human-readable certificate, no legal framework citation, no validator network, no royalty rails on top.
QRight + Bureau wraps the same hash in a signed, timestamped certificate citing 6 international frameworks, plus auto-routes royalties via Bank.
Excellent at moving money. Knows nothing about IP, validation, awards, or reputation. Cannot underwrite credit against creative output.
AEVION Bank issues salary advances against Trust Score (which composites IP, chess, Planet, awards, network). Stripe sees a payment; we see a graph.
$5K–$25K per filing, 6–18 months turnaround. Built for inventions, not for digital creative output (music, code, designs, AI artefacts).
Bureau issues the same legally-defensible certificate in seconds, denominated in international frameworks the office itself recognises (Berne, WIPO, TRIPS).
Domain-blind. Cannot read your IP portfolio, your wallet, your tier or your tournament history.
QCoreAI is bundled with full ecosystem context. Bank's Advisor knows your goals; Multichat agents specialise per domain. Sticky because it's useful.
Defensibility stack
AEVION's value is not 'sum of products' — it is a defensible, compounding system. It holds on five independent axes:
We know of no other operator running an end-to-end registry+signature+bureau+compliance+wallet pipeline as one system. The barrier isn't the idea — it's rebuilding all five layers integrated, then earning the Trust Graph from zero.
Every action on every module accrues into a unified composite reputation. After ~10K actives the graph is non-replicable. A competitor can copy any single module; nobody can copy the graph.
$340B TAM split across IP enforcement, creator economy and digital payments. We capture all three from a single deployment — not a roll-up, but a single system selling to three different buyers.
Ed25519 + Shamir SSS + HMAC + 6 international legal frameworks → Bureau certificates are credible to a court, an auditor, and an institutional treasury. Few competitors will catch up; fewer still will catch up before the post-quantum cliff.
Auth + Bureau + Bank + QCoreAI are shared infrastructure. Adding a new vertical (HealthAI, QPersona, Kids-AI) is mostly UI. Each new node makes every existing node more valuable — scope effect compounds without OPEX.
Ecosystem traction
We're still in stealth on most partnerships — full logos go up here once each partner clears the marketing review.
Honest answers
Every ambitious company faces real risks. We list ours openly and ship mitigations into the product itself, not just into a slide.
Mitigation: Bureau cites 6 standing international frameworks (Berne, WIPO, TRIPS, eIDAS, ESIGN, KZ Digital Sig) — we ride the standards body, not predict them. Planet voting layer adapts the validator quorum if frameworks shift.
Mitigation: Wedge is independent creators (no graph required for them to extract value from a single QRight cert). Cross-module gravity kicks in only after wedge is monetised — graph is a bonus, not a precondition.
Mitigation: QCoreAI routes across 5 providers (Claude/GPT/Gemini/DeepSeek/Grok) and auto-selects per task. QFusionAI roadmap deepens this. We negotiate from a portfolio position, never single-vendor.
Mitigation: Defensible through bundling: a creator using QRight also gets royalties through Bank, validation through Planet, recognition through Awards. Switching out QRight breaks 4 other workflows.
Mitigation: Only 13 of 42 nodes are committed to ship in the next 18 months. The remaining 29 are roadmap signals (cheap optionality), not parallel work-streams. Engineering capital concentrated on the 4 highest-revenue modules first.
Mitigation: Quantum Shield (Ed25519 + Shamir SSS) already deployed. Migration path to lattice-based PQC is design-anticipated; certificates can be re-signed under future schemes without breaking the chain.
Go-to-market
AI-music and AI-film artists registering work in QRight + submitting to Awards. Wedge: 'provable authorship and timestamp in 30 seconds'. Conversion to Bank is automatic (royalty payout settles to AEC).
Studios, agencies, design firms, code shops needing fast certificates and licensing flows. Bureau + QSign + Planet as a per-cert + per-verification SaaS.
Compliance teams adopting Planet for ESG and audit; central banks and registries trialling Quantum Shield for institutional custody. Multi-year licensing contracts.
Every module exposes /api endpoints. Fintechs, music platforms and patent agents integrate AEVION — we become the rails, not the destination.
Trajectory
Illustrative aspiration — not the base case and not a forecast. The company is pre-revenue ($0) today. The defensible base case is the bottom-up model above (≈$2.76M beachhead → ≈$28.75M regional ARR from three flagships); this curve is top-down upside if the ecosystem flywheel compounds. Inputs: comparable SaaS take rates, observed creator-economy GMV, historical IP-bureau cert pricing.
The people executing
Capital-efficient lean team — 12 working MVPs already shipped is the proof of velocity. Specific founding-team biographies and advisors are available under NDA via the investor demo.
We're raising for a focused 18-month sprint: harden the launched 12 modules, ship 4 of the 30 emerging nodes, and lock 2 enterprise compliance pilots. Capital is for engineering, GTM in three creator verticals, and one regulatory partnership. The offer is one, not a ladder: a partnership — $10M returnable advance plus resources (compute, engineers, distribution, brand), revenue split 51% founder / 49% partner, founder stays as Chief Idea Officer. Not a buyout.
See the full deal ladder (1% → 95%) →
AEVION · 42 modules · 12 feature-complete · one Trust Graph · 2026